Importance of Reading Trial Courts Judgments (LITIGATION BASICS 2)
Reading
and understanding judgments is an essential task for law students and
practicing lawyers. Judgment reading is an art that develops with continuous
practice. While much emphasis is placed on reading judgments of the Supreme
Court and High Courts, trial court judgments are often ignored by law students and
junior advocates on the ground that they do not ordinarily constitute binding
precedents and are always subject to appeal or revision; however, such
judgments are indispensable for understanding trial court procedure and the
actual working of trials in practice.
Judgments of the Supreme Court and High Courts primarily deal with questions of law and interpretation of statutory provisions, whereas trial court judgments focus on the application of law to facts, appreciation of evidence, and procedural compliance. Trial courts are the forums where facts are proved, evidence is tested, and witnesses are examined. Therefore, trial court practice requires a thorough understanding of substantive law, procedural law, and the law of evidence in their practical application.
(1)
Understanding How Actual Trials Are Conducted
Reading
trial court judgments helps in understanding how an actual trial proceeds—from
pleadings to evidence, examination of witnesses, arguments, and final
adjudication. Such judgments demonstrate how courts assess facts, weigh
evidence, and apply judicial precedents to real-life disputes.
(2)
Understanding the Practical Application of Substantive Law
Trial
court judgments illustrate how substantive laws are applied based on the facts
and evidence of each case.
Example:
In criminal trials, trial court judgments explain why a particular provision of
the Indian Penal Code is invoked instead of another, based on the nature of
allegations, evidence produced, and intent attributed to the accused.
(3)
Understanding the Practical Application of Procedural Law (CPC and CrPC/BNSS)
Trial
court judgments provide practical exposure to procedural law, including:
1. Different stages of civil and
criminal trials
2. Various forms of pleadings and
petitions used at the trial stage
3. Use of interlocutory applications
at appropriate stages
4. Framing of issues in civil cases
and framing of charges in criminal cases
This
understanding is critical for effective trial preparation and case management.
(4)
Understanding the Practical Application of the Law of Evidence
Trial
court judgments are an excellent source for understanding evidence law in
practice, including:
1. Types of evidence required to
prove a case
2. Determination of admissibility
and authenticity of evidence
3. Procedure for producing and
exhibiting documents and material objects before the court
(5)
Understanding Examination and Cross-Examination of Witnesses
Examination
and cross-examination of witnesses are core aspects of advocacy. Trial court
judgments often record questions put to witnesses and the answers elicited.
Studying these judgments helps in understanding:
·
Effective
questioning techniques
·
How
contradictions are brought on record
·
How
credibility of witnesses is assessed by the court
(6)
Understanding the Arguments Advanced by Parties
Trial
court judgments reflect how parties structure their arguments based on facts,
statutory provisions, and judicial precedents. This assists in understanding:
·
Application
of legal provisions to factual situations
·
Relevance
of precedents at the trial stage
·
Manner
of addressing evidentiary and procedural issues
(7)
Understanding the Application of Judicial Mind
At
the conclusion of a trial, the court applies its judicial mind to the facts,
evidence, and arguments before delivering its judgment. Reading trial court
judgments helps in understanding:
·
How
findings of fact are arrived at
·
How
evidence is appreciated
·
How
conclusions are logically drawn
This insight is crucial for drafting pleadings, preparing arguments, and formulating grounds of appeal.

No comments: